Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

U.S. UPADHAYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The appeal is abated because all appellants have died.

Summary

The appeal filed by U.S. Upadhaya and Hari Shanker Pandey against the State of U.P. remained pending for many years. No counsel appeared for the appellants, though the respondent's counsel was present. The court sought verification of the appellants' status and received a report confirming that both appellants had died in 2025. Evidence included witness statements, police reports, a village head's certificate, and a statement from the head constable. Since both appellants were deceased, the court held that the criminal appeal could not continue and ordered it to be abated, consigning the record to the trial court for necessary action.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the death of all appellants on a pending criminal appeal?

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • abeyance
  • death of appellant
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                        CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3017 of 1987

                                    U.S. Upadhaya And Another
                                                                                                   .....Appellant(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State of U.P.
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)                              :    A.K. Shukla
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                             :    A.G.A.

                                    Court No. - 84
                                                          HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J.

                                    1. Case called on. No one appears on behalf of the appellants to press this
                                    appeal, however, learned AGA is present.

                                    2. This appeal, preferred by the appellant, Uma Shanker Upadhyay and Hari
                                    Shanker Pandey, is of the year 1987, which is very old and has been pending
                                    since then.

                                    3. This Court had directed the learned C.J.M., Mau to submit the living
                                    status of the appellants. As per report of learned C.J.M., Mau dated
                                    09.12.2025, appellant no.1, Uma Shanker Upadhyay died on 14.06.2025 and
                                    appellant no.2, Hari Shaker Pandey, died on 27.10.2025.

                                    4. In verification of their death, statement of witness, report of Police Station
                                    concerned, certificate of village Pradhan and statement of Head Constable
                                    Ramesh Kumar is annexed with the report of C.J.M., Mau.

                                    5. In view of the above, since both the appellants have already expired, this
                                    Criminal Appeal stands abated.

                                    6. The instant criminal appeal be, accordingly, consigned to record and trial
                                    court record be sent to the trial court concerned for necessary action.



                                                                                                (Sanjiv Kumar,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Subham




Digitally signed by :-
SUBHAM KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.