Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEEPAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioner Deepak Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioner failed to appear, even after the list was revised. The learned Additional Government Advocate appeared for the State respondents. Since there was no prosecution of the petition, the Court dismissed the writ petition. The interim order, if any, was also discharged. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • procedural default
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10714 of 2025

                                    Deepak Singh
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Lakshman Tripathi, Sandeep Kumar,
                                                                       Suryansh Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. List has been revised.

                                    2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call
                                    whereas learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents is present.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.



                                                                  (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Prajapati RK




Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.