Allahabad High Court
RADHEY SHYAM TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners at the revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State respondents. The court noted the absence of petitioners' representation and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim relief previously granted was discharged. The dismissal was pronounced by Judges Tarun Saxena and Chandra Dhari Singh on September 29, 2026.
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural default
- non-appearance
- high court
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11529 of 2025
Radhey Shyam Tripathi And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Pratap Singh, Krishna Anand,
Sachin Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Brijesh Kumar Chaturvedi, G.A.,
Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call
whereas learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents is present.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 29, 2026
Prajapati RK
Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…