Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHABAB KHAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Shabab Khan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, and the State Law Officer representing the respondents raised no objection. The Court considered the request and, noting the absence of any opposition, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Judges Chandra Dhari Singh and Tarun Saxena on 29 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • The Court’s jurisdiction to permit withdrawal of a pending writ petition.
  • The procedural requirements for granting leave to withdraw a petition after filing.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • procedural law
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • court discretion

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12424 of 2025

                                    Shabab Khan And 4 Others
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Om Narayan Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, after some length
                                    of arguments, prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition.

                                    2. Mr. Vijay Rathi, learned State Law Officer appearing on behalf of the
                                    State-respondents has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by
                                    learned counsel for the petitioners.

                                    3. Heard Mr. Om Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners,
                                    Mr. Vijay Rathi, learned State Law Officer for the State-respondents.

                                    4. Taking into consideration, the statement made by learned counsel for
                                    the petitioners and no objection by the learned State Law Officer, the
                                    petitioners are permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

                                    5. Leave granted.

                                    6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                  (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Prajapati RK




Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.