Allahabad High Court
RAM SAWARE @ NARESH KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Ram Saware @ Naresh Kumar Pandey and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 12519 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition listed counsel K.K. Rao and Pradeep Kumar Srinette for the petitioners and G.A. for the respondents. On the date of hearing, none of the petitioners or their counsel appeared, while the learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State was present. The Court examined whether the petition could proceed in the absence of the petitioners. Applying the principle that a writ petition must be prosecuted by the petitioner, the Court held that the petition could not be entertained. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order, if any, was discharged.
Issues considered
- Can a writ petition be proceeded with when the petitioner fails to appear before the Court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- procedural default
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12519 of 2025
Ram Saware @ Naresh Kumar Pandey And
Another .....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : K.K.Rao, Pradeep Kumar Srinette
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call
whereas learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents is present.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 29, 2026
Prajapati RK
Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…