Allahabad High Court
ABHISHEK SINGH BHADAURIYAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
Summary
The petitioner, Abhishek Singh Bhadauriya, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 13011 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of UP and two others. The petition was listed and subsequently revised, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the revised hearing. The learned Additional Government Advocate appeared for the respondents. In the absence of any representation for the petitioner, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was also discharged.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the Court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
- criminal law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13011 of 2025
Abhishek Singh Bhadauriya
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call
whereas learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents is present.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 29, 2026
Prajapati RK
Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…