Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEV MOHAN KHANNA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing, even after the list was revised. The learned Additional Government Advocate appeared for the State respondents. Since the petitioners did not prosecute the petition, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was discharged. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear before the Court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13066 of 2025

                                    Dev Mohan Khanna And 6 Others
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Mehul Khare, Saurabh Kesarwani
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. List has been revised.

                                    2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call
                                    whereas learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents is present.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.



                                                                  (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Prajapati RK




Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.