Allahabad High Court
OMVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Omveer Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered that any interim order, if existent, stand vacated. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Tarun Saxena on September 8, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear for prosecution of a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13232 of 2026
Omveer Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashwani Kumar, G.A., Sati Shanker
Tripathi
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call.
2. Learned AGA for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 8, 2026
Atul
Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…