Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUSHIL AWANA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Sushil Awana and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of an investigation. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favorable to the petitioners had been submitted. Consequently, the petitioners expressed their intention to withdraw the writ petition. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the parties' consent, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal by the petitioners after the investigation has concluded

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • investigation report
  • high court dismissal
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13816 of 2026

                                    Sushil Awana And 3 Others
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Anupam Dubey, Vimalendra Kumar
                                                                      Shukla
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Alok Singh, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. Sri Indu Prakash Nishad holding brief of Sri Anupam Dubey, learned
                                    counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that investigation
                                    in the instant case has already been concluded and final report has been
                                    forwarded in favour of the petitioners and as such, he does not intend to
                                    further press this petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 29, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                      (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.