Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT SANGEETA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that until cognizance is taken on the police report, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

Summary

Smt Sangeeta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The petitioners argued that without cognizance they should not be detained. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to avoid premature arrest, directed that the petitioners not be arrested until cognizance is taken on the police report. Accordingly, the court disposed of the writ petition, leaving the matter to be decided by the trial court on cognizance.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ court can prohibit arrest of petitioners pending cognizance of a charge sheet
  • Whether interim relief is appropriate when the status of cognizance is uncertain

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • writ petition
  • interim order
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14769 of 2025

                                    Smt Sangeeta And Another
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                              :    Om Prakash Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                              :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                             HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                             HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioners shall not be
                                    arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                     (Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.