Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AMIT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioner, Amit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum later. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the proceeding. Accordingly, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after the investigation is concluded and a charge-sheet is filed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15296 of 2026

                                    Amit Yadav
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Ramesh Kumar Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that
                                    in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and
                                    charge-sheet has been forwarded against the petitioner.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid
                                    facts but states that he does not want to press this writ petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at
                                    appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.



                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.