Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TAHIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and the State's consent.

Summary

Petitioner Tahir filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After filing, he informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing a writ petition after it has been filed?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal procedure
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15523 of 2026

                                    Tahir
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Sandeep
                                                                Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard Shri Shubham Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri
                                    Ravindra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
                                    AGA for the State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that petitioner has already been arrested and,
                                    as such, he does not intend to press this writ petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.