Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHAKIL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Shakil Ahmad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15534 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging his detention. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested. The petitioner expressed his intention not to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the petitioner's request and the State's consent, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated, and the matter was concluded without any order on the merits.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15534 of 2026

                                    Shakil Ahmad
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Mishra, Vikrant Pratap
                                                                Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, Shri Anil Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri
                                    Vikrant Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner has made
                                    a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the petitioner has
                                    already been arrested and as such, he does not intend to further
                                    press the instant writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.