Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AKHILESH YADAV ALIAS BAUVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

A writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner, with no objection from the State, seeks to withdraw it.

Summary

The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav alias Bauva, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State’s Advocate General raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered whether a writ petition could be withdrawn after filing and, finding no impediment, accepted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • The petitioner's request to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15562 of 2026

                                    Akhilesh Yadav Alias Bauva
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhand          Pratap   Singh,     Shobhit
                                                                Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard Shri Akhand Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that petitioner has already been arrested and, as
                                    such, he does not intend to press this writ petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.