Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHIV BHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioner, Shiv Bhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against the accused. The State counsel informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted on 21 June 2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts and expressed his intention to withdraw the writ petition, reserving the right to approach the appropriate forum later. The court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage. The petition was thus dismissed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • charge-sheet

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15563 of 2026

                                    Shiv Bhan
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                :   Ram Krishna Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out
                                    that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded
                                    and a charge-sheet has been forwarded against the accused
                                    persons on 21.06.2026.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid facts but states that he does not intend to further press
                                    this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach
                                    the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.