Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NEERAJ PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Neeraj Pathak, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16007 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. On behalf of the petitioner, counsel Rajrshi Gupta and Rizwan Ahamad prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Advocate General (A.G.A.) raised no objection to the withdrawal request. The Court, comprising Hon'ble Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Tarun Saxena, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was dated 29 September 2026 and signed digitally by the court.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for a petitioner to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • High Court of Allahabad

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16007 of 2025

                                    Neeraj Pathak
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :     Rajrshi Gupta, Rizwan Ahamad
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                        HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                        HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Mr. Rajrshi Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
                                    petitioner prayed for leave to withdraw the present writ petition.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer made
                                    by learned counsel for the petitioner.

                                    3. Leave granted.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Saurabh
                                                                   (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.