Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SURENDER AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Surender and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was already completed and a charge-sheet had been filed against the accused. Petitioners did not contest these facts but expressed their intention to withdraw the writ petition. The Court, noting the clear withdrawal request, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal by the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • charge-sheet
  • High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16062 of 2026

                                    Surender And 2 Others
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   Ajay Kumar, Anup Rai
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out
                                    that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded
                                    and a charge-sheet has been forwarded against the accused
                                    persons.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid facts but states that he does not intend to further press
                                    this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.