Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VISHAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Vishal Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they do not wish to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel and the Attorney General for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the clear intention of the petitioners to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural outcome when a petitioner voluntarily seeks to withdraw a writ petition and the respondents do not object?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16069 of 2026

                                    Vishal Singh And Another
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Patel
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aman Singh Visen, G.A., Satyendra
                                                                Kumar Tripathi

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State, Sri Aman Singh Visen, learned counsel for the respondent
                                    no.4 and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that he does not
                                    intend to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and learned A.G.A. for
                                    the State have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.