Allahabad High Court
MITHILESH KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request and the respondents’ consent.
Summary
Mithilesh Kumar Pandey filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State and the other respondent did not oppose the withdrawal. The court considered the parties’ consent to withdraw the petition. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn after filing with the consent of the parties
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- procedural law
- high court
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16074 of 2026
Mithilesh Kumar Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kulveer Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
State, Shri Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the
respondent no.4 and perused the record.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the
respondent no.4 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 9, 2026
Nadim
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…