Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BANVARI LAL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and the respondents' consent.

Summary

Petitioners Banvari Lal and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for respondent No.3 raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the consent of all parties, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The petition was thus closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing and with the consent of the respondents

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court
  • consent of parties

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                          CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16105 of 2026

                                    Banvari Lal And 5 Others
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                   Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aparna Tripathi, Priya Dubey,
                                                                Ravesh Kumar Singh, Ravi Jha,
                                                                Sharadey Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dharmendra Pratap Singh, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Dharmendra Pratap
                                    Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3, learned A.G.A. for
                                    the State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.3 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Sanjeet
                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.