Allahabad High Court
ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Ankit Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16109 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Vageesh Pandey, announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of Uttar Pradesh raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered whether the petition could be dismissed on the basis of the petitioner's express desire to withdraw. Finding no impediment and noting the State’s consent, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and with the respondent's consent?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16109 of 2026
Ankit Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vageesh Pandey, Vandana Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record.
2. At the very outset, Shri Vageesh Pandey, learned counsel for the
petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to
press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
September 9, 2026
Sanjeet
Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…