Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAHUL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 07-06-2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to approach the appropriate forum later. The court considered the petitioner's request and the procedural status of the case. Accordingly, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the petitioner seeks to withdraw it after the charge-sheet has been filed?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • charge-sheet
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16114 of 2026

                                    Rahul Sharma
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 5 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Anil Kumar Jaiswal
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that
                                    in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and
                                    charge-sheet has been forwarded against the petitioner on
                                    07.06.2026.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid
                                    facts but states that he does not want to press this writ petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at
                                    appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.



                                                                    (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Sanjeet




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.