Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NEETU SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Neetu Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the fourth respondent raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the request and, finding no opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The dismissal concluded the proceedings without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition filed in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing
  • Whether the court requires any formal order or hearing to effect such withdrawal

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16116 of 2026

                                    Neetu Singh And Another
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :    Atul Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :    Deepak Dubey, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State, Shri Deepk Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent no.4
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.