Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

C.B. SINGH @ CHANDRABALI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that a petition may be withdrawn with the consent of the parties and thus dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Summary

A writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 16566 of 2026) was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by C.B. Singh @ Chandrabali Singh against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajnish Kumar Verma, sought leave to withdraw the petition after hearing. The respondent’s counsel, G.A., raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the lack of objection, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16566 of 2026

                                    C.B. Singh @ Chandrabali Singh
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Krishna Pratap Singh, Rajnish Kumar
                                                                     Verma, Vinay Kumar Singh Chandel
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Sri Rajnish Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
                                    petitioner, after some length of argument prays for leave to withdraw the
                                    present petition.

                                    2. Learned counsel for respondent has no objection.

                                    3. Leave granted.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Atul




Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.