Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAGANNATHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Jagannath, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed against the accused. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition. The Court, noting the petitioner's request for withdrawal and the lack of any substantive dispute, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16737 of 2026

                                    Jagannath
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 7 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Akash Kumar Verma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA
                                         for the State.

                                         2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the
                                         instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and a
                                         charge-sheet has been submitted against the accused persons.

                                         3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                         aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this writ
                                         petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                         4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                         withdrawn.


                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    R




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.