Allahabad High Court
DHARMRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Dharmraj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 16808 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the court, while the State and other respondents were represented. The court observed that the petitioner failed to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Additionally, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the petitioner's failure to appear and prosecute the writ petition?
Subjects
- procedural default
- want of prosecution
- writ petition
- interim order vacated
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16808 of 2025
Dharmraj
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rajesh Kumar Mishra
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the
petitioner to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the State
and Mr. Aryaman Basu, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 are
present.
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 29, 2026
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…