Allahabad High Court
SANVVARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as the charge-sheet has been filed and cognizance taken.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanvvar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him by the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The respondents submitted that a charge-sheet had been filed and the trial court had taken cognizance of the offence. The learned Additional Government Advocate could not dispute this submission. The High Court, after noting that the charge-sheet was already filed and cognizance taken, dismissed the writ petition. The court indicated that the petitioner could seek appropriate remedies against the charge-sheet under the relevant provisions of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be entertained when a charge-sheet has been filed and cognizance of the offence has been taken by the trial court
Subjects
- writ petition
- charge-sheet
- cognizance
- criminal procedure
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1719 of 2026
Sanvvar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranjeet Kumar Asthana
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Neha Khan
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Ms. Neha Khan, learned counsel for the respondent No.4
submits the charge-sheet has been filed and the cognizance of
the offence has been taken by the learned trial court.
The aforesaid submission could not be disputed by the learned
A.G.A.
In the wake of aforesaid submission, the writ petition is
dismissed.
It is open to the petitioner to invoke appropriate remedies against
the charge-sheet under the relevant provisions of the B.N.S.S.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
March 19, 2026
Ashish Tripathi
Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…