Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SALMAN ODI @ AJARUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Salman Odi @ Ajaruddin, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17327 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars. The respondents, including the State, raised no objection to this request. The Court, after noting the petitioner’s statement and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file a new petition. The Court also ordered the return of the certified copies of the documents to the petitioner’s counsel as per procedural rules.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17327 of 2026

                                    Salman Odi @ Ajaruddin
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       :   Abhishek Tandon, Arvind Kumar, Manish
                                                                        Kumar Pandey, Mushtaq Ahmad, Vivek
                                                                        Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       :   G.A., Sunil Kumar Saroj

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                           HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                           HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sunil Kumar Singh,
                                    learned counsel for the respondent no.4, learned AGA for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press the
                                    petition and seek to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better
                                    particulars.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the respondent
                                    no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the
                                    counsel for the petitioner as per Rules.

                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Sanjeet
                                                                           (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.