Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SARAJVEER AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The court considered the request to withdraw the writ petition. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition filed in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding can be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural law
  • High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17340 of 2026

                                    Sarajveer And 3 Others
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          :      Pankaj Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          :      G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.