Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and lack of objection from respondents.

Summary

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State and the other respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the petitioner's request and, finding no opposition, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after his arrest

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • Allahabad

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17356 of 2026

                                    Akash
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Ashwani Tripathi, Ramanuj Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : Ashish Kumar, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ashish Kumar,
                                    learned counsel for the respondent no.4, learned AGA for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made
                                    a statement at the Bar that the petitioner has already been arrested
                                    and as such, he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the respondent
                                    no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                   (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Sanjeet




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.