Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARUN KUMAR (MINOR)versusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The minor Arun Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the clear intention of the petitioner to discontinue the proceedings, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of a petitioner's request to withdraw a writ petition after filing?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • minor
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17358 of 2026

                                    Arun Kumar (Minor)
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of Up And 2 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        :   Babu Ram Yadav, Sameer Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                    (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Sanjeet




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.