Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SEEMA BARGAH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Seema Bargah and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State and the fourth respondent, represented by their counsel, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioners' clear intention to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural outcome when a petitioner voluntarily withdraws a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • procedural law
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17364 of 2026

                                    Seema Bargah And 2 Others
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Virendra Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : G.A., Santosh Kumar Mishra, Vinay
                                                                     Kumar Mishra

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Vishwanath Mishra,
                                    Advocate holding brief of Shri Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel
                                    for the respondent no.4, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the
                                    record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                    (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Sanjeet




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.