Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAYA DEVI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Maya Devi and four others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17369 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. The petition was being heard by Hon'ble Justices Rajiv Gupta and Devendra Singh-I. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 8 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17369 of 2026

                                    Maya Devi And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Mahesh Kumar, Ravi Shankar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks
                                    to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 8, 2026
                                    KU

                                                                      (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.