Allahabad High Court
REENA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Reena Yadav filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17434 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered whether a petition can be withdrawn at the stage of hearing and, finding no impediment, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and during the hearing
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- high court
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17434 of 2026
Reena Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Fakhruzzaman, Falaq Wakeel
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record.
2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want
to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 23, 2026
Sanjeet
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…