Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and lack of objection from respondents.

Summary

Petitioner Akash Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the respondents, including the State, raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of opposition. Accordingly, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and without opposition from the respondents

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17480 of 2026

                                    Akash Singh
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Shubham Singh, Vipul Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A., Ravish Chandra Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State, Sri R.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.3
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.3
                                    has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    5. All the pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Sanjeet

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.