Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHARIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Sharik, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17490 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered whether a petition can be withdrawn at its own request when the opposite party consents. Finding no impediment, the Court ordered the writ petition to be dismissed as withdrawn. The judgment was pronounced on 23 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing, with the consent of the respondent State.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17490 of 2026

                                    Sharik
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :    Tabish Yusufi, Zia Uddin
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Sanjeet

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.