Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SACHIN KUMAR @ SUNNY DEOL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Sachin Kumar @ Sunny Deol and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They informed the Court that they had already been arrested by the police and expressed their desire to withdraw the petition. The State and the fourth respondent raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the petitioners' statement and the lack of objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Can a criminal miscellaneous writ petition be withdrawn by the petitioners after their arrest?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • High Court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17948 of 2026

                                    Sachin Kumar @ Sunny Deol And Another
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Kiran Yadav, Sanjay Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   G.A., Vipul Kumar Singh

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri
                                    Vipul Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and perused the
                                    record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that the petitioners have already been arrested by the
                                    police and, as such, he does not intend to further press this petition and seeks
                                    to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA as well as counsel for respondent No. 4 has no objection to
                                    the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 22, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                       (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.