Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KAJAL DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

Kajal Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favoring the accused was submitted on 28 April 2026. The petitioner’s counsel did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating he would approach the appropriate forum later if needed. The court accepted the withdrawal request and dismissed the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • High Court
  • investigation report
  • liberty to approach

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17950 of 2026

                                    Kajal Devi
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :    Devendra Kumar Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out
                                    that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded
                                    and final report has been forwarded in favour of the accused
                                    persons on 28.04.2026.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid facts but states that he does not intend to further press
                                    this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach
                                    the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.