Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DHANRAJ NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Dhanraj Nishad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation. The investigating agency had already concluded the inquiry and issued a final report in the petitioner’s favour on 28 December 2025. The petitioner, through counsel Rajesh Kumar Verma, expressed his desire to withdraw the writ petition, a request the State’s A.G.A. did not oppose. The Court, after noting the withdrawal request, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • investigation report

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18076 of 2026

                                    Dhanraj Nishad
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 7 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :   Rajesh Kumar Verma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the
                                    instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and a
                                    final report has been forwarded in favour of the petitioner on
                                    28.12.2025.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this writ
                                    petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    4. Learned AGA has no objection to the same.

                                    5. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 8, 2026
                                    S. Singh

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.