Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANKUR KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

The petitioner, Ankur Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation that had concluded with a final report favoring the accused on 12 April 2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and the report was already submitted. The petitioner did not contest these facts and expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, reserving the right to approach the appropriate forum later. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw and the procedural propriety of dismissing a petition on such a basis. Accordingly, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after the investigation has concluded?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court
  • investigation report

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18078 of 2026

                                    Ankur Kumar
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          : Narendra Kumar, Sitendra Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.


                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the
                                    instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has
                                    been forwarded in favour of the accused persons on 12.04.2026.


                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts but
                                    states that he does not intend to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw
                                    it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.


                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
                                    with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Sanjeet

                                                                    (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.