Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KRISHAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Krishan Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and six others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the investigation had been completed and the final report was favorable to the petitioner, and that he no longer wished to pursue the writ. The State’s Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for one of the respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioner’s clear intention to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced on 23 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural disposition when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after the investigation is concluded?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • Allahabad High Court
  • petition dismissed
  • investigation concluded

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18080 of 2026

                                    Krishan Kumar
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          :   Amit Rana, Rajesh Verma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          :   G.A., Narendra Singh

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State, Shri Narendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent
                                    no.2 and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has
                                    already been concluded and the final report has been forwarded in
                                    favour of the petitioner and as such, he does not intend to further
                                    press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.2 has no objection.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.