Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PRADUMAN JOSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and the respondents' consent.

Summary

Petitioners Praduman Joshi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The State and the other respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the consent of all parties, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing and with the consent of the respondents?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18134 of 2026

                                    Praduman Joshi And Another
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   Padmaker Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   G.A., Pradeep Kumar

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard Shri Padmaker Pandey, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioners, Shri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the
                                    record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Sanjeet

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.