Allahabad High Court
AMANversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Aman filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18148 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. No counsel appeared for the third respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Can a criminal miscellaneous writ petition be dismissed on the petitioner's request to withdraw it?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- criminal miscellaneous
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18148 of 2026
Aman
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amish Yadav, Saurabh Tripathi,
Shantanu Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Nitin Agarwal
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the
respondent no.3 even in the revised call.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
State and perused the record.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this
writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
4. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
5. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 23, 2026
Nadim
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…