Allahabad High Court
RAM KISHUN AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the parties' statements and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated beyond the procedural withdrawal.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing, with the consent of the respondent?
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous writ
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18149 of 2026
Ram Kishun And 9 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record.
2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want
to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 23, 2026
Sanjeet
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…