Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ALAM @ SAHRE ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Alam @ Sahre Alam, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18152 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court examined the petitioner's request and, finding it voluntary and unopposed, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner at the hearing stage with the consent of the respondent.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18152 of 2026

                                    Alam @ Sahre Alam
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Babu Mishra, Jainendra
                                                                Kumar Pandey, Ravindra Kumar
                                                                Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Sanjeet

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.