Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUDHIRAMversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Sudhiram, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18158 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Om Prakash, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for the State and the counsel for respondent No.4, Amit Kumar Pandey, expressed no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the petitioner's clear intention to abandon the proceedings and the lack of any opposition. Accordingly, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural outcome when a petitioner voluntarily withdraws a criminal miscellaneous writ petition and there is no objection from the respondents?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • dismissal
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18158 of 2026

                                    Sudhiram
                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          :   Om Prakash
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          :   Amit Kumar Pandey, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State, Shri Amit Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4 and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.