Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAMSHANKAR YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and the final report was favorable to them, and they wished to withdraw the petition. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioners’ clear intention to discontinue the proceedings, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal by the petitioners

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18164 of 2026

                                    Ramshankar Yadav And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Hukum Singh, Puneet Bhadauria
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : G.A., Santosh Kumar Yadav

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of
                                    respondent no.4 even in the revised call.

                                    2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    3. At the very outset, Ms. Shweta Rai, Advocate holding brief of
                                    Sri Puneet Bhadauria, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation
                                    has already been concluded and final report has been forwarded in
                                    favour of the petitioners, as such, she does not intend to further
                                    press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    4. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    5. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.