Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAYKISHAN RANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Jaykishan Rana filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18189 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to discontinue the proceedings, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Hon'ble Judges Rajiv Gupta and Devendra Singh‑I on September 9, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and with no objection from the respondent

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18189 of 2026

                                    Jaykishan Rana
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :    Devendra Kumar Patel
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.