Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AVNISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Avnish, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18192 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Nirbhay Singh, announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s counsel, G.A., raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the parties’ positions, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and without a hearing on its merits

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18192 of 2026

                                    Avnish
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :   Nirbhay Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to further press this petition
                                    and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    KU

                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.