Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KAMRAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18203 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced at the Bar that they wished to withdraw the petition and would file a fresh one with better particulars. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The Court, noting the petitioners’ clear intention to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting them liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court also ordered the return of the certified copies of the documents to the petitioners’ counsel.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court practice

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18203 of 2026

                                    Kamran And 2 Others
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :    Bhavya Sahai
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :    Amit Kumar Singh, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for
                                    the respondent no.5, learned AGA for the State and perused the
                                    record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that he does not
                                    intend to press the petition and seek to withdraw it with liberty to
                                    file fresh with better particulars.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.5 have no objection.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    6. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the
                                    counsel for the petitioners as per Rules.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Sanjeet

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.